Author Topic: Is Molyneux right about IQ?  (Read 4334 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #30 on: November 16, 2017, 08:01:41 PM »
0
IQ plays a role but it's way overstated. You can say that low-IQ people cause more crime because people who were arrested for committing crimes were low-IQ but one can't speculate on the IQ of people who were smart enough to get away with it. Also IQ plays a little role in people who extract freebiues from the state if you include all of them and not just EBT, WIC...etc. Old people (smart or stupid) are the groups who suck the most amount of money from the state if you include SSI, Medicare, and Medicade. Seems like political tunnel vision.

The curious part of ethno-nationalists is why they would use race as a determiner of IQ rather than an IQ test. If your goal is to have a high-IQ society and that IQ is mostly expressed deterministicly though genes, why exclude high-IQ in lower-IQ ethnic groups and include low-IQ people from high-IQ ethnic groups? Just make them take an IQ test and if you rate below certain thresholds you're not allowed in. Or better yet, make them take a 23&Me test to see if you have high-IQ genes over lower-IQ genes and judge on those? Race seems to be a wonky middle man in that goal.

IQ can lead to making better decisions.  Also it depends on the case, some people are very critical about IQ and some are very supportive.  I don't think IQ is everything you still need a good work ethic and natural talent helps as well.  Not everyone with a high IQ has natural talent in a given field.

That is true that people with higher IQ's may be smart enough to find away not to get caught but  i"m sure that's very minimal especially with advanced forensic technology.  I think the smartest way not to get caught is to not do it in the first place.  A high IQ person usually has the ability to compete so they don't have to resort to that kind of thing.  Although some may see it as a rush so they do it anyways.  All in all I don't see any indication that the numbers would be substantially different.

I'm not sure what extracting freebies from the state has to do with anything but okay.  Old people also have put the most into the system as well.  SS and I think it's medicare is money you  put in so you can take out later.  It's not an entitlement like welfare is.


 Well that's because they are collectivists and that means they see people as groups, not a collection of individuals.

That's because their goal isn't a high IQ society, a white nationalist is a white only society by definition.  If it was about IQ they would want Asians and Jews to come it but they obviously don't want that, especially Jews they hate Jews with a bloody passion.  White nationalists want to preserve their culture(whatever white culture is I have no idea) and race.  It's not about having an intelligent society.

A high IQ nationalist I guess you would call it would call for IQ tests when it comes to immigration and race would have no factor. Simply how well they did on the IQ test.

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #31 on: November 16, 2017, 08:19:43 PM »
0
Stefan isn't right on IQ. As with all topics he talks about he has invested a minimum amount of time to actually researching the subject, instead he elevates fringe positions and uses misleading statistics and graphs. Stef's interest in race and IQ are also clearly in service of his ideology and new White nationalist persona, rather than some commitment to respecting the research literature. Finding Stef to be authoritative or even well informed on the topic is only possible if you don't know or care about what the actual literature on IQ shows, hint: it isn't what Molyneux says.

LMAO white nationalist??  Do you know anything about white nationalism??  They are white separatists something Stef is not.

I have researched this subject extensively and Stef is correct about IQ and race.  I've fact checked his graphs and statistics and they all check out.

It's only a fringe position because many people have a hard time deceiving between race and IQ and racial pseudo science advocated by the Nazis. Many people are afraid to be called nazis in this day an age so they avoid the topic.  However if you look deeper at the science you see no correlation between nazi racial pseudo science and legitimate racial science of today.

Stef has had numerous experts in the field of IQ on his show and I"m sure he's done his research as well.  Stef knows what he's talking about and my fact checking has proved this to me.  I don't just believe people blindly believe it or not.

Anyone who says they have fact checked Stef's graphs and statistics and they 'check out', clearly isn't someone very experienced at doing independent research. Stef's factoids usually come from real sources, it's just that they do not support his conclusions nor are they put in the appropriate context.

Stef's experts on IQ are almost universally from the fringe of the discipline. Relying on their views as representative of the field is akin to relying on climate denialists to accurately represent the field of climate science. Your faith in Stef and his research is touching but not exactly the mark of an independent critical thinker. It seems more like you have been bamboozled by a YouTube guru peddling ideology as science on the basis of him sounding authoritative and sincere. Stef's level of research on almost every topic he opines is woeful, it only impresses if you have little knowledge of whatever topic he is waffling about.

You are also constructing a false dichotomy. Recognizing the importance of IQ and the relevant research literature is not the same thing as accepting Molyneux's ideologically drenched spin.

Facts are facts man no matter what context or conclusion you want to make of it.  That's simply an opinion anyways.  Different people can come to different conclusions.....so because someone is on the fringe that means they are wrong???

I guess it's the way we see the world because I see climate alarmists as full of non-sense and fear mongering.

Actually I've been researching topics like this for awhile.  He simply put it in videos.  I've read much more in depth where it explains that you can even tell someone's race by their skull shape.   Forensics use this method all the time.  On average certain races are more aggressive than others because of their general hormone makeup.  Stef only touches the tip of the ice berg when it comes to racial differences.  All of these facts that Stef presents checks out in real time as well.  It explains so much.  Why the Asians do so well and are normally on the nerdier side.  Why blacks do much poorer is comparison but are outstanding athletically.  This all comes back to IQ and racial differences on average.  It makes so much sense in real time there is no way it can be wrong.  It's like I can blatantly see the kettle is gold but you're telling no no no no it's not you're just an idiot.

Lets just talk about IQ alone for a moment.  How can IQ not matter when the higher the tax bracket the higher the average IQ?? Racially the higher the average IQ of that race the lower the crime.  How can IQ not matter??  I just don't see any rational, logical way to argue that.

What problem do you have with Stef's so called "spin"?


Bhez7

  • FDR Interested
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: +12
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #32 on: November 16, 2017, 09:47:14 PM »
0
"It makes so much sense in real time there is no way it can be wrong"

Appears to be the crux of your understanding, pure personal experience, "it's just common sense". Do you have any statistical evidence that distinctly shows asians are more academic and blacks are more athletic and that this is definitely caused by differences in genetic makeup?

Megafauna

  • FDR Interested
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: +44
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #33 on: November 18, 2017, 09:30:10 AM »
+1
Facts are facts man no matter what context or conclusion you want to make of it.  That's simply an opinion anyways.  Different people can come to different conclusions.....so because someone is on the fringe that means they are wrong???

The question is why are they are they on the fringe? The usual answer is that they are ignoring a mountain of contradictory evidence. And when you ONLY talk to people on the fringe you end up with a very skewed perspective. See the opinions you advance below...

I guess it's the way we see the world because I see climate alarmists as full of non-sense and fear mongering.

What happened to there only being one truth? Now it seems you are arguing that it is all subjective. Sorry Kronze, while I'm not surprised to find out that you lean towards the climate change denialist camp, you don't get to invent your own brand of facts. Whatever you feel about the climate change debate is irrelevant. Your opinion is simply that of an uninformed non-scientist spouting off in the face of the mountain of evidence that demonstrates why your (ideologically inspired) hunches are wrong. Your posts have repeatedly shown that you have very little ability to think critically and no real understanding of how to do proper research. That you would think yourself qualified to judge the 'non-sense' (that's usually one word) of the climate 'alarmists' is not surprising and is yet another indication of why you would find someone like Stefan, a man who revels in his fake expertise, compelling.

Actually I've been researching topics like this for awhile.  He simply put it in videos.  I've read much more in depth where it explains that you can even tell someone's race by their skull shape. Forensics use this method all the time.

Amazing Kronze. It's impressive how you've managed to do all that research and still failed to encounter that forensic anthropologists being relatively good at identifying a skeleton's 'race' does not actually lend support to any of the claims about the validity of popular concepts of 'race' or its relationship with IQ. Maybe you should try researching harder from some better sources?

On average certain races are more aggressive than others because of their general hormone makeup.

Wow, check out the science on this guy. What particular 'general hormone makeup' are you talking about? And which specific research papers did you consult to reach your conclusions? Are you going to cite some rubbish about MAOA? If so, I strongly recommend before doing so you bother to do basic independent research on the topic- how it is portrayed on racist/race baiting sites does not reflect the status of the actual research literature. Google scholar is your friend.

Stef only touches the tip of the ice berg when it comes to racial differences.  All of these facts that Stef presents checks out in real time as well.  It explains so much. Why the Asians do so well and are normally on the nerdier side. Why blacks do much poorer is comparison but are outstanding athletically. This all comes back to IQ and racial differences on average.  It makes so much sense in real time there is no way it can be wrong. It's like I can blatantly see the kettle is gold but you're telling no no no no it's not you're just an idiot.

lol, sure Kronze you are not racist. You are just someone who can SEE the 'truth' about race; that Asians are nerdy and Blacks stupid but athletic. You are certainly correct that the race realist rabbit hole goes much deeper than Molyneux and its unsurprising to find out you are well on your way down. The fact that you can't spell nonsense, abuse common idioms (pots are usually black...), and believe that the world's greatest philosopher is a YouTuber releasing daily videos producing misogynistic rants and praising Trump, might lead some to question the standards of your 'research'/ depth of your insights but pffft... they are obviously just afraid of the TRUTH you have uncovered!

Lets just talk about IQ alone for a moment.  How can IQ not matter when the higher the tax bracket the higher the average IQ??

First off, allow me to repeat myself "You are constructing a false dichotomy. Recognising the importance of IQ and the relevant research literature is not the same thing as accepting (your/)Molyneux's ideologically drenched bullshit". Second, do you think maybe it's possible that better performance on IQ tests might be related to higher quality/more education? And do you think that maybe, just maybe, those in higher tax brackets might (on average) have come from families who could afford better educational opportunities? Man, I actually think IQ is important and has a genetic component but it is people like you with your terrible arguments and transparent racial agenda that make it difficult to discuss anything meaningful about the topic.

Racially the higher the average IQ of that race the lower the crime.  How can IQ not matter??  I just don't see any rational, logical way to argue that.

IQ matters but not in the way you envision. And nor does modern research on the topic accord with your simplistic racial hierarchy narratives or pseudoscientific notions about r/k selection and alpha/beta males.

What problem do you have with Stef's so called "spin"?

That it is based almost entirely on ideology, involves emotional manipulation and the misrepresentation/distortion of research and 'facts'.

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #34 on: June 30, 2018, 02:32:02 AM »
0
No its on fringe because matter more to people k ow a days and these facts offend some people.  I'm well aware of all of the perspectives on this topic.

You just show crashed your lack of interpretation right there.  My point is many people have different perspectives only one is realty.

Its you trying to create facts not me.  I've done a ton of research on all topics I'm taking about here.  I know the different arguments.  Ill say this there has been some man made climate change but Its very minimal.  To claim otherwise is against the facts and is simply fear mongering for for poltical and monetary gain.

I think critically, you think with emotions AKA you don't think.


Actually it does, it proves races exist and that differences do exist.

Example black people generally have higher levels of testosterone than other races which leads to being more likely to having prostate issues and hypertension.

Your mind is way to simple to undersntand the complexity of racial differences.  Just because one race has a higher average IQ doesnt mean they are all "nerdy".  He'll some very intelgent people arent nerdy although many are.  Also there are many varations  between individuals within a given race.  Not all Asians have high IQ's   just more likely that they will have a high IQ   compared to other races.

Same is true with blacks not all of them are athletic its just more likely they will be.  There are also very intlegent black people like Ben Carson and Thomas Sowell.

What is misogynistic about Stef's rants??  What's wrong with praising Trump he's done a good job.

Iq measures intelligence not knowledge so yes I've considered it and thought that was the reason why at first too but I eventually realize that want the case.  I realized like said intelligence and knowledge are not the same thing.

Oh yeah I'm a guy who has said you know the world would be a better place if we where all mixed and therefore  races would no longer exist is racist. Yeah okay and the sky is green and the grass is blue too.I still mean that.  It would be better if this where true but its not, I've accepted that.

Its not a hierarchy because hierarchies are absolute and races are diferent.  No one race is superior to another.

r/K I think is far more complex than Stef   makes it but it does exist as well as alpha/beta.  You cleary are seeing what you want to see if you deny the alpha beta dynamic.

Its just facts though no manipulation.

Facts are facts man no matter what context or conclusion you want to make of it.  That's simply an opinion anyways.  Different people can come to different conclusions.....so because someone is on the fringe that means they are wrong???

The question is why are they are they on the fringe? The usual answer is that they are ignoring a mountain of contradictory evidence. And when you ONLY talk to people on the fringe you end up with a very skewed perspective. See the opinions you advance below...

I guess it's the way we see the world because I see climate alarmists as full of non-sense and fear mongering.

What happened to there only being one truth? Now it seems you are arguing that it is all subjective. Sorry Kronze, while I'm not surprised to find out that you lean towards the climate change denialist camp, you don't get to invent your own brand of facts. Whatever you feel about the climate change debate is irrelevant. Your opinion is simply that of an uninformed non-scientist spouting off in the face of the mountain of evidence that demonstrates why your (ideologically inspired) hunches are wrong. Your posts have repeatedly shown that you have very little ability to think critically and no real understanding of how to do proper research. That you would think yourself qualified to judge the 'non-sense' (that's usually one word) of the climate 'alarmists' is not surprising and is yet another indication of why you would find someone like Stefan, a man who revels in his fake expertise, compelling.

Actually I've been researching topics like this for awhile.  He simply put it in videos.  I've read much more in depth where it explains that you can even tell someone's race by their skull shape. Forensics use this method all the time.

Amazing Kronze. It's impressive how you've managed to do all that research and still failed to encounter that forensic anthropologists being relatively good at identifying a skeleton's 'race' does not actually lend support to any of the claims about the validity of popular concepts of 'race' or its relationship with IQ. Maybe you should try researching harder from some better sources?

On average certain races are more aggressive than others because of their general hormone makeup.

Wow, check out the science on this guy. What particular 'general hormone makeup' are you talking about? And which specific research papers did you consult to reach your conclusions? Are you going to cite some rubbish about MAOA? If so, I strongly recommend before doing so you bother to do basic independent research on the topic- how it is portrayed on racist/race baiting sites does not reflect the status of the actual research literature. Google scholar is your friend.

Stef only touches the tip of the ice berg when it comes to racial differences.  All of these facts that Stef presents checks out in real time as well.  It explains so much. Why the Asians do so well and are normally on the nerdier side. Why blacks do much poorer is comparison but are outstanding athletically. This all comes back to IQ and racial differences on average.  It makes so much sense in real time there is no way it can be wrong. It's like I can blatantly see the kettle is gold but you're telling no no no no it's not you're just an idiot.

lol, sure Kronze you are not racist. You are just someone who can SEE the 'truth' about race; that Asians are nerdy and Blacks stupid but athletic. You are certainly correct that the race realist rabbit hole goes much deeper than Molyneux and its unsurprising to find out you are well on your way down. The fact that you can't spell nonsense, abuse common idioms (pots are usually black...), and believe that the world's greatest philosopher is a YouTuber releasing daily videos producing misogynistic rants and praising Trump, might lead some to question the standards of your 'research'/ depth of your insights but pffft... they are obviously just afraid of the TRUTH you have uncovered!

Lets just talk about IQ alone for a moment.  How can IQ not matter when the higher the tax bracket the higher the average IQ??

First off, allow me to repeat myself "You are constructing a false dichotomy. Recognising the importance of IQ and the relevant research literature is not the same thing as accepting (your/)Molyneux's ideologically drenched bullshit". Second, do you think maybe it's possible that better performance on IQ tests might be related to higher quality/more education? And do you think that maybe, just maybe, those in higher tax brackets might (on average) have come from families who could afford better educational opportunities? Man, I actually think IQ is important and has a genetic component but it is people like you with your terrible arguments and transparent racial agenda that make it difficult to discuss anything meaningful about the topic.

Racially the higher the average IQ of that race the lower the crime.  How can IQ not matter??  I just don't see any rational, logical way to argue that.

IQ matters but not in the way you envision. And nor does modern research on the topic accord with your simplistic racial hierarchy narratives or pseudoscientific notions about r/k selection and alpha/beta males.

What problem do you have with Stef's so called "spin"?

That it is based almost entirely on ideology, involves emotional manipulation and the misrepresentation/distortion of research and 'facts'.

Lupus

  • FDR Aware
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Respect: +31
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #35 on: June 30, 2018, 11:20:23 PM »
0
I've done a ton of research on all topics I'm taking about here.  I know the different arguments.


It's a shame you're not able to make any of them.

I think critically, you think with emotions AKA you don't think.


Not an argument.

Your mind is way to simple to undersntand the complexity of racial differences.


Not an argument.

He'll some very intelgent people arent nerdy although many are.


Excellent, you're obviously well versed in the subject.

What is misogynistic about Stef's rants??


Molyneux sees women as venal, miserable, violent whores, parasites 'milking money out of men’s dicks', these 'f*cking sex clowns' are the cause of war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity, STDs, the great depression, the welfare state, they 'worship at the feet of the devil', they usher in child abuse, criminality, sociopathy (etc etc) . . . you name any ill in the world and Molyneux has likely, at some point, attributed it to women, take any call from his call-in show, where a father ('father') has sexually abused his child or a father has left the family in dire straits through gambling, alcoholism, violence or simply abandoning his wife and children and Molyneux will find a way to blame it all on the mother . . .  it's hard to believe someone has (in all honesty) watched his videos and his militantly cynical attitude towards women has managed to pass them by, it doesn't take a trained psychologist to see (or at least make an educated guess) that his intense hatred of women, loudly broadcast to the world in a shrill and angry tone, is a prologned scream against the injustices he feels he suffered under his own mother.



. .

1) violence exists in the world because of the way women treat children.

Quote: [@21:00] “We’ve got this problem called violence, and we have the science that says where it comes from, basically the first couple of years of a child’s life, well my next question as a space alien would be ‘Ok, if violence comes from childhood, early childhood in particular, why who is in charge of early childhood . . 50/50 chance, give me a guess . . yes it’s the ladies who are in charge of childhood”

Quote: “Violence is formed in childhood, women control childhoods”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QD7Y1jgs7o

(note: the majority of what Molyneux says in regard to this issue is rejected by the science)

________________________________________


2) Dysfunctional early childhood experiences caused by women are the cause of war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity and sexually transmitted diseases"

Quote: [@24:00] “If we could just get people to be nice to their babies for five years straight, that would be it for war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, almost all would be completely eliminated, because they all arise from dysfunctional early childhood experiences, which are all run by women.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QD7Y1jgs7o

(note: the majority of what Molyneux says in regard to this issue is rejected by the science)

________________________________________


3) Women caused the great depression.

Quote: [@44:00] “So women didn’t have a lot of property when they got the vote, what did they do . . . with that vote ?” [caller: “well they probably voted to turn things in their favour of course”] . . . “Yeah, they voted to take away everyone else’s property” [caller: “Ok” (nervous laughter)] . . .  “But this is why you have a great depression right after women get the vote, because women are like ‘hey free stuff !’ . . . ”

http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_3246_Call_In_Show_30_Mar_2016.mp3

________________________________________

4) Women are running the world, and can you just see how much better it’s getting (sarcasm).

Quote: [@17:55]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXpfqUBwQss&spfreload=10

________________________________________

5) White western women are miserable, miserable, miserable people.

Quote: [@22:50]

‎cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_3267_Call_In_Show_19_Apr_2016.mp3

________________________________________

6) Women got the vote, and because women could vote this caused the
welfare state . . . (and the welfare state is the end of civilisation . . .)


Quote: [@37:35] “The reason the western world has a welfare state is because women got the vote”


http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_3278_Call_In_Show_29_Apr_2016.mp3

________________________________________

7) Women are whores who are destroying civilisation.


Quote: [ @video is 1 minute long ] “So, how do you save western civilisation ? It only takes a quarter (US coin), it only costs a quarter, and here’s what you do, see, ladies, get a quarter, when ‘Duddley McStudMuffin’ comes along and wants to bang you six ways senseless up against the wall, what do you do, you take the quarter, you put it between your knees and . . .  [Molyneux’s mocking tone very suddenly turns to shouted anger ] . . . YOU KEEP IT THERE !”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXD4LKNnRIg&spfreload=10

________________________________________


Estrogen Based Parasites #killallmen - YouTube

1:15:50 [women] stop making yourself look like f*cking sex clowns to milk money out of men’s dicks

. . . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DXshfD3s6g

The Matriarchal Lineage of Corruption

"Women who choose the assholes will f*cking end this race. They will f*cking end this human race if we don't start holding them a-f*cking-countable. Women who choose assholes guarantee child abuse. Women who choose assholes guarantee criminality. Sociopathy. Politicians. All the cold-hearted jerks who run the world came out of the vaginas of women who married assholes, and I don't know how to make the world a better place without holding women accountable for choosing assholes! Your dad was an asshole because your mother chose him, because it works on so many women! If "asshole" wasn't a great reproductive strategy, it would have been gone long ago. Women keep that black bastard flame alive. They cup their hands around it. They protect it with their bodies...Keep f*cking monsters, we get catastrophes, we get war, we get nuclear weapons, we get national debts, we get incarcerations and prison guards and all the other florid assholes who rule the world. Women worship at the feet of the devil and wonder why the world is evil."

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #36 on: July 01, 2018, 12:26:01 AM »
0
No he sees a certain type of women that way and sadly many women but not all are that way.  Don't be mad because he points out an offensive, unsavory truth.  Hey many men have their problems too.  However to say women don't enable that behavior would be complete denial.  If bad men get laid that helps to continue the cycle.  Stef is the ultimate feminist he's just about tough love.

As for the economy.  You can honestly deny that women generally vote for more goverment intervention which leads to economical problems??  Why are you mad he points this reality out??  Should he put it in kinder gentlier words, yeah but being blunt about it doesn't make it any less true.







I've done a ton of research on all topics I'm taking about here.  I know the different arguments.


It's a shame you're not able to make any of them.

I think critically, you think with emotions AKA you don't think.


Not an argument.

Your mind is way to simple to undersntand the complexity of racial differences.


Not an argument.

He'll some very intelgent people arent nerdy although many are.


Excellent, you're obviously well versed in the subject.

What is misogynistic about Stef's rants??


Molyneux sees women as venal, miserable, violent whores, parasites 'milking money out of men’s dicks', these 'f*cking sex clowns' are the cause of war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity, STDs, the great depression, the welfare state, they 'worship at the feet of the devil', they usher in child abuse, criminality, sociopathy (etc etc) . . . you name any ill in the world and Molyneux has likely, at some point, attributed it to women, take any call from his call-in show, where a father ('father') has sexually abused his child or a father has left the family in dire straits through gambling, alcoholism, violence or simply abandoning his wife and children and Molyneux will find a way to blame it all on the mother . . .  it's hard to believe someone has (in all honesty) watched his videos and his militantly cynical attitude towards women has managed to pass them by, it doesn't take a trained psychologist to see (or at least make an educated guess) that his intense hatred of women, loudly broadcast to the world in a shrill and angry tone, is a prologned scream against the injustices he feels he suffered under his own mother.



. .

1) violence exists in the world because of the way women treat children.

Quote: [@21:00] “We’ve got this problem called violence, and we have the science that says where it comes from, basically the first couple of years of a child’s life, well my next question as a space alien would be ‘Ok, if violence comes from childhood, early childhood in particular, why who is in charge of early childhood . . 50/50 chance, give me a guess . . yes it’s the ladies who are in charge of childhood”

Quote: “Violence is formed in childhood, women control childhoods”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QD7Y1jgs7o

(note: the majority of what Molyneux says in regard to this issue is rejected by the science)

________________________________________


2) Dysfunctional early childhood experiences caused by women are the cause of war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity and sexually transmitted diseases"

Quote: [@24:00] “If we could just get people to be nice to their babies for five years straight, that would be it for war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, almost all would be completely eliminated, because they all arise from dysfunctional early childhood experiences, which are all run by women.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QD7Y1jgs7o

(note: the majority of what Molyneux says in regard to this issue is rejected by the science)

________________________________________


3) Women caused the great depression.

Quote: [@44:00] “So women didn’t have a lot of property when they got the vote, what did they do . . . with that vote ?” [caller: “well they probably voted to turn things in their favour of course”] . . . “Yeah, they voted to take away everyone else’s property” [caller: “Ok” (nervous laughter)] . . .  “But this is why you have a great depression right after women get the vote, because women are like ‘hey free stuff !’ . . . ”

http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_3246_Call_In_Show_30_Mar_2016.mp3

________________________________________

4) Women are running the world, and can you just see how much better it’s getting (sarcasm).

Quote: [@17:55]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXpfqUBwQss&spfreload=10

________________________________________

5) White western women are miserable, miserable, miserable people.

Quote: [@22:50]

‎cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_3267_Call_In_Show_19_Apr_2016.mp3

________________________________________

6) Women got the vote, and because women could vote this caused the
welfare state . . . (and the welfare state is the end of civilisation . . .)


Quote: [@37:35] “The reason the western world has a welfare state is because women got the vote”


http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_3278_Call_In_Show_29_Apr_2016.mp3

________________________________________

7) Women are whores who are destroying civilisation.


Quote: [ @video is 1 minute long ] “So, how do you save western civilisation ? It only takes a quarter (US coin), it only costs a quarter, and here’s what you do, see, ladies, get a quarter, when ‘Duddley McStudMuffin’ comes along and wants to bang you six ways senseless up against the wall, what do you do, you take the quarter, you put it between your knees and . . .  [Molyneux’s mocking tone very suddenly turns to shouted anger ] . . . YOU KEEP IT THERE !”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXD4LKNnRIg&spfreload=10

________________________________________


Estrogen Based Parasites #killallmen - YouTube

1:15:50 [women] stop making yourself look like f*cking sex clowns to milk money out of men’s dicks

. . . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DXshfD3s6g

The Matriarchal Lineage of Corruption

"Women who choose the assholes will f*cking end this race. They will f*cking end this human race if we don't start holding them a-f*cking-countable. Women who choose assholes guarantee child abuse. Women who choose assholes guarantee criminality. Sociopathy. Politicians. All the cold-hearted jerks who run the world came out of the vaginas of women who married assholes, and I don't know how to make the world a better place without holding women accountable for choosing assholes! Your dad was an asshole because your mother chose him, because it works on so many women! If "asshole" wasn't a great reproductive strategy, it would have been gone long ago. Women keep that black bastard flame alive. They cup their hands around it. They protect it with their bodies...Keep f*cking monsters, we get catastrophes, we get war, we get nuclear weapons, we get national debts, we get incarcerations and prison guards and all the other florid assholes who rule the world. Women worship at the feet of the devil and wonder why the world is evil."

Lupus

  • FDR Aware
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Respect: +31
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #37 on: July 01, 2018, 01:37:16 AM »
+1
No he sees a certain type of women that way and sadly many women but not all are that way.

From watching his output over the years I'd say his disdain for women was pretty universal, I don't doubt we can pick out a few examples of women he'd have praise for, but generally speaking, as a whole, he detests women.

Don't be mad because he points out an offensive, unsavory truth.

Don't be offended or hurt because I question your idealised view of a hero figure.

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #38 on: July 14, 2018, 07:56:21 PM »
0
The women he talks about he mostly distains but so are the men.  He show is about partly about pointing out flaws in people and he does that brilliantly.  For the record he mostly distains women who remind him of his mother and rightfully so.

No man I just find it hilarious how much Stef  is living inside your head rent free.  I criticize him too.  I think anarchy is ridiculous.

No he sees a certain type of women that way and sadly many women but not all are that way.

From watching his output over the years I'd say his disdain for women was pretty universal, I don't doubt we can pick out a few examples of women he'd have praise for, but generally speaking, as a whole, he detests women.

Don't be mad because he points out an offensive, unsavory truth.

Don't be offended or hurt because I question your idealised view of a hero figure.

Lupus

  • FDR Aware
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Respect: +31
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #39 on: July 14, 2018, 08:19:04 PM »
0
The women he talks about he mostly distains but so are the men.

Barely an English sentence.

He show is about partly about pointing out flaws in people and he does that brilliantly.  For the record he mostly distains women who remind him of his mother and rightfully so.

Agreed, a lot of his hatred for women would seem to be rooted in his sense that he was treated badly as a child, I think 'mommy issues' is the term.

No man I just find it hilarious how much Stef  is living inside your head rent free.

No more or less than he's in your head, to me he's just one of an endless parade of internet 'gurus' who come and go, it seems like he means a little more to you, if he were to disappear tomorrow I wouldn't care in the slightest, but I expect there are legions fanboys out there who would be weeping into their semen stained copies of UPB and petitioning the church/government for Molyneux to be made a saint / put on a postage stamp.  ;D
« Last Edit: July 14, 2018, 08:20:37 PM by Lupus »

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #40 on: July 14, 2018, 09:42:05 PM »
0
Close enough

Yeah he has ever right to not like these women.  Terrible people.

He's in both of our heads.  In a negative way for you.  Postive  for you.

What do you have against guros??

Nah man you'd be butt hurt too because you'd have to find someone else to focus all your hate on.

The women he talks about he mostly distains but so are the men.

Barely an English sentence.

He show is about partly about pointing out flaws in people and he does that brilliantly.  For the record he mostly distains women who remind him of his mother and rightfully so.

Agreed, a lot of his hatred for women would seem to be rooted in his sense that he was treated badly as a child, I think 'mommy issues' is the term.

No man I just find it hilarious how much Stef  is living inside your head rent free.

No more or less than he's in your head, to me he's just one of an endless parade of internet 'gurus' who come and go, it seems like he means a little more to you, if he were to disappear tomorrow I wouldn't care in the slightest, but I expect there are legions fanboys out there who would be weeping into their semen stained copies of UPB and petitioning the church/government for Molyneux to be made a saint / put on a postage stamp.  ;D

Lupus

  • FDR Aware
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Respect: +31
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2018, 11:18:30 PM »
0
Yeah he has ever right to not like these women.  Terrible people.

His hatred for his mother has metastasized into a mistrust, suspicion and hatred of women in general, he really should have dealt with this decades ago, he says he's been through therapy, but clearly this is still something that steers his thinking.


He's in both of our heads.  In a negative way for you.  Postive  for you.

Another odd sentence, if it's a question, I'd say I have a negative image of Molyneux (of course), but he doesn't really bother me, I don't wake up in the morning screaming his name and shaking my first at the sky ;D I see him as a sort of curiosity, I find his videos entertaining, if only in that it's rare to see someone so flawed and at the same time so lacking in self-awareness, I suppose it's like a reality TV show for me, lol, or maybe a zoo, he can often make fascinating watching, but for reasons I suspect his audience don't share.

What do you have against guros??

When I use the word 'gurus' I am (perhaps inaccurately) referring to pedlars of bullshit.

Nah man you'd be butt hurt too because you'd have to find someone else to focus all your hate on.

There is a near endless supply of all-knowing gurus out there, I can't imagine Molyneux will be particularly missed when he's gone, well perhaps amongst some of his audience, but there are dozens of gurus waiting to fill the gap in the market. People love having something or someone to follow, defend, fight for (and so on) it's part of our nature (witness your white-knighting here), so when the focus of that impulse disappears the impulse doesn't disappear along with it, it's simply refocused elsewhere.



« Last Edit: July 14, 2018, 11:25:36 PM by Lupus »

Kronze21

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
  • Respect: +1
Re: Is Molyneux right about IQ?
« Reply #42 on: July 16, 2018, 01:39:38 AM »
0
Wrong, he does have a thing against single mothers ill give you that but not women in general.

You're projecting, the person so flawed is you.  Like they say the things you think you hate in others is what you actually hate about yourself.

Why don't you just say that then??  Also what is bullshit about Stef??

I defend people who I see being unfairly treated.  I even do the same for people I don't necessarily like.  I just spend less time doing it for them.  As for following, I follow one thing, the truth.  If you spread the truth ill support you.  Sadly that's not the case for you.

Also if this is just how people are why so butt hurt about it??

Yeah he has ever right to not like these women.  Terrible people.

His hatred for his mother has metastasized into a mistrust, suspicion and hatred of women in general, he really should have dealt with this decades ago, he says he's been through therapy, but clearly this is still something that steers his thinking.


He's in both of our heads.  In a negative way for you.  Postive  for you.

Another odd sentence, if it's a question, I'd say I have a negative image of Molyneux (of course), but he doesn't really bother me, I don't wake up in the morning screaming his name and shaking my first at the sky ;D I see him as a sort of curiosity, I find his videos entertaining, if only in that it's rare to see someone so flawed and at the same time so lacking in self-awareness, I suppose it's like a reality TV show for me, lol, or maybe a zoo, he can often make fascinating watching, but for reasons I suspect his audience don't share.

What do you have against guros??

When I use the word 'gurus' I am (perhaps inaccurately) referring to pedlars of bullshit.

Nah man you'd be butt hurt too because you'd have to find someone else to focus all your hate on.

There is a near endless supply of all-knowing gurus out there, I can't imagine Molyneux will be particularly missed when he's gone, well perhaps amongst some of his audience, but there are dozens of gurus waiting to fill the gap in the market. People love having something or someone to follow, defend, fight for (and so on) it's part of our nature (witness your white-knighting here), so when the focus of that impulse disappears the impulse doesn't disappear along with it, it's simply refocused elsewhere.