Author Topic: Debunking Molyneux's philosophical views  (Read 717 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pavlov's Dog

  • Guest
Debunking Molyneux's philosophical views
« on: January 05, 2018, 11:23:39 AM »
+3
Well hello there. I am making a series where I debunk Stef's alleged philosophical achievements and abilities in an entertaining and hopefully informative fashion. I figured such a project would be invaluable given the aims and goals of this website. So if you want a quick and easy way of convincing dyed in the wool Molly heads to think twice about leaving their families this should do it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXsiJMVigwQ&t=217s 

phlogiston

  • FDR Aware
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Respect: +1
Re: Debunking Molyneux's philosophical views
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2018, 06:34:01 PM »
0
As a philosophy major i can follow your video. I doubt a follower will. Spend more than 30 seconds on modus tollens/pollens has lost them already. Show how the p>s flipped is radical. Liked the transposition to predicate logic but still not quick enough. Watch sysiphus redeemed vids. Hes really good. Contentwise i have no problem. You picked a specific thing and went with it. I am not active here but cheked in today. I was part of lime back in the day when things like the lokian proviso were prominant. Just giving my feedback and  applauding your time elucidating the issues.