“...I need convincing that Molyneux even HAS philosophical views to debunk. He's mostly an endless daily vomiting of personal grievances mixed with justifications for treatment of others as worthless inferiors.”--Money Detonator
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hi All,I write this as an interested observer.When that guy describes Molyneux as seeming "so non threatening" I thought that incredibly strange, as to me he had always come across as aggressive to the point of being a bully. I guess others must not get the same vibe from him as I did (and still do), but I had always assumed that others excused his aggressive manner, as opposed to not perceiving it.Do those at FDR really think he has a non-threatening manner, or is it rationalised away?
Quote from: L on September 09, 2015, 11:14:54 PMHi All,I write this as an interested observer.When that guy describes Molyneux as seeming "so non threatening" I thought that incredibly strange, as to me he had always come across as aggressive to the point of being a bully. I guess others must not get the same vibe from him as I did (and still do), but I had always assumed that others excused his aggressive manner, as opposed to not perceiving it.Do those at FDR really think he has a non-threatening manner, or is it rationalised away?I began listened to the FDR podcasts in order from the beginning, and I agree that his tone has changed over the years. I think earlier on he was less threatening and more compassionate sounding. He comes across much more angry and arrogant in recent years.Still, I do remember hearing the way he would laugh at people sometimes, or the way he would express anger, and being very off-put. During those times I would usually end up convinced that I had heard his tone wrong because of my own childhood traumas. Over time, though, all of that stuff added up and ended up helping me discredit him and break free eventually.
Disillusioned, when you say your childhood trauma, was that mostly from the inevitable twisted perspective about your childhood from listening to Molyneux or was it true abuse? Or was it just normal traumas that we all get growing up due to life, by it's own nature, being quite imperfect?
I listened to FDR zero not so long ago and noticed a big difference in his tone of voice then compared to now. He has become more and more arrogant and less inclined to hide his true nature.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eWpo4faDtY
Quote from: Elucidated on September 10, 2015, 07:49:19 AMI listened to FDR zero not so long ago and noticed a big difference in his tone of voice then compared to now. He has become more and more arrogant and less inclined to hide his true nature.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eWpo4faDtYExcept defooing. He is afraid to talk openly about that in public.
Hi All,I write this as an interested observer.When that guy describes Molyneux as seeming "so non threatening" I thought it incredibly strange, as to me he had always come across as aggressive to the point of being a bully. I guess others must not get the same vibe from him as I did (and still do), but I had always assumed that others excused his aggressive manner, as opposed to not perceiving it.Do those at FDR really think he has a non-threatening manner, or is it rationalised away?Edit: Grammars