“...I need convincing that Molyneux even HAS philosophical views to debunk. He's mostly an endless daily vomiting of personal grievances mixed with justifications for treatment of others as worthless inferiors.”--Money Detonator
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
IMO, Joe Rogan is probably not a good influence to the message being transmitted here.
"Did you know he once denigrated a philosopher over the man’s weight? Apparently, he considers even overweight as an outer symptom of a moral failing. This is what he said about the man: “Wow, he’s got to be like 300 pounds – I wonder if a philosopher should not be able to at least control his own appetite…”
Interesting that you say Quote "Did you know he once denigrated a philosopher over the man’s weight? Apparently, he considers even overweight as an outer symptom of a moral failing. This is what he said about the man: “Wow, he’s got to be like 300 pounds – I wonder if a philosopher should not be able to at least control his own appetite…”More hypocrisy
After listening to Stefan's outer persona (false self, to use his own terminology?!) for 3 hours, everything else I know about him fades to the background a bit, and a site like this does seem like an extreme reaction to an internet radio show. He presents himself as a reasonable dude who merely suggests that people align their actions with their principles (either by changing their lives, or by being honest with themselves about what they truly believe and value). And while that may be generally true, you can look through this site, the Tru Shibes videos, etc. to see all the instances where he has crossed the line.
After listening to Stefan's outer persona (false self, to use his own terminology?!) for 3 hours, everything else I know about him fades to the background a bit, and a site like this does seem like an extreme reaction to an internet radio show. He presents himself as a reasonable dude who merely suggests that people align their actions with their principles (either by changing their lives, or by being honest with themselves about what they truly believe and value).
The day Joe Rogan discovered the real Stefan MolyneuxOn your newstand now!
Question, I dispute your assertion that no one was talking about the ethicist part of Molyneux's saga. Philosophy Lines had made a video about that angle 5 days ago and I believe he was in some clashes with folks on the anarcho-capitalist subreddit after posting it too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxT24kBnHD0&list=UUr42uLz8tYgRW9Q5FJW0yeg&index=2
Thanks for sharing that video, BiggerThanBothofMe. Very laughable but, oh so much truth in it.The big resulting question is, if after all of this has come out into the open, the true believers are still in defense of their Holy Moly, what is it that eventually breaks through in those such as yourself who are able to "wake up" and see Molyneux for what he really is?
I'm working my way through it. He does pull back a lot. I quit FDR because of the misogyny and stef argument to rogan was that he was "just trying to shed the light on women that no one else will". That is total BS. He doesn't just shed light on the abuses of women he drags them through the mud. Just look at the his response to Ana from the young Turks, it's peppered with sexist slurs like "maybe if you didn't spend so much time with your make up you'd have more time to do proper research". Women as the gate keepers for asshole, etc, etc.