“...I need convincing that Molyneux even HAS philosophical views to debunk. He's mostly an endless daily vomiting of personal grievances mixed with justifications for treatment of others as worthless inferiors.”--Money Detonator
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I watched the linked video (thank you OGREtheTroll ! - it's laughably awful as described, lots of laughing and mocking but not much in the way of counterargument . . . about the best Molyneux could muster was that people shouldn't criticise UPB unless they start their criticism at page one of UPB ! Yes, as bizarre as this sounds this really is the angle Molyneux takes . . . if your central objection to an idea put forward is best represented by what is said on - for example - page 20, then your objection is illegitimate because the book starts at page 1 . . . this is seriously the objection Molyneux makes !!!? . . . . Apparently If you criticise the Bible because in Judges there might be some ideas you question then that criticism is illegitimate because the Bible starts with Genesis and not Judges . . . . laughably stupid stuff !! Anyhow, it looks like he's taking another run at this . . . . he's reuploaded the video - without all the negative comments . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G84nav_bDPQ&pbjreload=10