Author Topic: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!  (Read 61055 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Omega

  • Banned
  • FDR Authority
  • *
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #180 on: July 02, 2014, 05:47:26 AM »
0
Lol arrrgh Omega you probably wouldn't believe me if I told you there are plenty of mature men whose lives don't revolve around getting laid!

Who says otherwise? we have like 3 billion men on earth you can find all kinds of people around.

And I was not talking about MATURE men I was talking exactly about immature boys in their puberty and early adulthood when entire life revolves about getting laid and nothing more.
If you believe otherwise you are living in delusion which is reason of your frustration and feminism. You just refuse to accept realty.

Lee Li

  • Libertarian Socialist
  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Respect: +2
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #181 on: July 02, 2014, 12:53:03 PM »
0
So then, Omega, wouldn't that mean that you should tell these men to grow up rather than make a whole political movement out of immaturity?
Keep Calm And Disobey

Omega

  • Banned
  • FDR Authority
  • *
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #182 on: July 02, 2014, 02:26:54 PM »
0
So then, Omega, wouldn't that mean that you should tell these men to grow up rather than make a whole political movement out of immaturity?

What exactly is the point to grow up especially at age of 17-25 or ever what benefits you get from growing up and what exactly does it mean?

do you suggest that mature man should settle with wrinkled old hag instead of of enjoying something he had no ability to enjoy when he was young?

Lee Li

  • Libertarian Socialist
  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Respect: +2
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #183 on: July 03, 2014, 12:32:00 AM »
0
So then, Omega, wouldn't that mean that you should tell these men to grow up rather than make a whole political movement out of immaturity?

What exactly is the point to grow up especially at age of 17-25 or ever what benefits you get from growing up and what exactly does it mean?

do you suggest that mature man should settle with wrinkled old hag instead of of enjoying something he had no ability to enjoy when he was young?

I suggest that young men learn to detach their egos from the act of getting laid. To have self esteem inspite of it. As Lowkey said,

If you don't respect yourself, no one's gonna respect you
If you don't love yourself, no one's gonna love you

It's a special kind of love, a very special kind of love,
A very very special kind of love

Second verse go's out to the males of the species
The ones who've got different women for each week
What's next? I'll break down the player complex
And tell you what the motive behind it is cause it's not sex
Most people at some point got their heart broke
Misery loves company some people just can't cope
A man that hops beds cause he's scared to sleep alone
Is the same as a loose women that can't keep 'em closed
Your both in the same boat, this is what you need to know
A man gets called a player, as for the woman she's a hoe
The truth is they both are insecure people trying to mend their broke hearts
If you brag that you've slept with thousands of girls
All that tells me is that you don't value yourself
You'll only be truly loved by someone else, when you learn to respect and to love yourself
Keep Calm And Disobey

Omega

  • Banned
  • FDR Authority
  • *
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #184 on: July 03, 2014, 04:44:58 AM »
0
Quote
I suggest that young men learn to detach their egos from the act of getting laid. To have self esteem inspite of it. As Lowkey said,

It has nothing to do with self esteem. you can have enormous confidence and self esteem going trough the roof and still you wont get laid.
as I described, problem is that if you treat women nicely they simply sexually ignore you.

Can you finally understand that if man is buying dinner for you and saying nice wolds he is doing that only to take you to his bed? He will take great care to make you think that he does not care about sex, but that is only thing in his head all the time.

When man is not interested in sex and still does same things he is probably looking for incubator to impregnate, maid to clean his home or punching bag.

sexual desire is most innocent thing you can expect from man.

Lee Li

  • Libertarian Socialist
  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Respect: +2
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #185 on: July 03, 2014, 08:06:15 AM »
0
Quote
I suggest that young men learn to detach their egos from the act of getting laid. To have self esteem inspite of it. As Lowkey said,

It has nothing to do with self esteem. you can have enormous confidence and self esteem going trough the roof and still you wont get laid.
as I described, problem is that if you treat women nicely they simply sexually ignore you.

Can you finally understand that if man is buying dinner for you and saying nice wolds he is doing that only to take you to his bed? He will take great care to make you think that he does not care about sex, but that is only thing in his head all the time.

When man is not interested in sex and still does same things he is probably looking for incubator to impregnate, maid to clean his home or punching bag.

sexual desire is most innocent thing you can expect from man.

Stop saying 'you', you don't know my gender or sexual orientation and that is very awkward.

The idea is to be okay with the reality that 'you' aren't going to get laid all the time, and that doesn't make 'you' worthless.

Just stop acting like you can read the minds of every man on this earth, even most of them. Maybe what you say is indicative about YOU, but you are not a psychic clone of every member of your gender.
Keep Calm And Disobey

MikeTO

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #186 on: July 03, 2014, 08:08:37 AM »
0
Quote
I suggest that young men learn to detach their egos from the act of getting laid. To have self esteem inspite of it. As Lowkey said,

It has nothing to do with self esteem. you can have enormous confidence and self esteem going trough the roof and still you wont get laid.
as I described, problem is that if you treat women nicely they simply sexually ignore you.

Can you finally understand that if man is buying dinner for you and saying nice wolds he is doing that only to take you to his bed? He will take great care to make you think that he does not care about sex, but that is only thing in his head all the time.

When man is not interested in sex and still does same things he is probably looking for incubator to impregnate, maid to clean his home or punching bag.

sexual desire is most innocent thing you can expect from man.

Stop saying 'you', you don't know my gender or sexual orientation and that is very awkward.

The idea is to be okay with the reality that 'you' aren't going to get laid all the time, and that doesn't make 'you' worthless.

Just stop acting like you can read the minds of every man on this earth, even most of them. Maybe what you say is indicative about YOU, but you are not a psychic clone of every member of your gender.

Actually you claimed to be male, unless you lied I will assume you're male.

MikeTO

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #187 on: July 03, 2014, 08:44:53 AM »
0
MikeTO asked: "Why don't men have a say in abortion or not?"

Because it's not your body.

Transmen can sometimes retain the ability to have children, in which case that man has a right to decide going through abortion. Because it is his body.

If you have an abortion, I fully support your choice. But I don't support your desire to control other people's choices over their own body.

Yes but that's not equality that feminism claim they want because with equality both sex need to have a say in it. 

MikeTO

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #188 on: July 03, 2014, 09:01:34 AM »
0
John Amory, professor of medicine at the University of Washington:
There was a male birth control.  Just because it's being developed by scientists doesn't mean it's being market.  Obviously you have done research about men sperm production.
Also I haven't had sex in 14 years.  I'm not interested in having children.  I don't want to end up with a woman who I don't love or want a relationship with.



More science and biology than social. Before the pill was available, men were the biggest focus of contraception through the use of condoms.

There are two main differences between men and women that make contracepting men more challenging:
1) Men make 1,000 sperm every second from puberty to death whereas women make one egg a month. Suppressing ovulation has proven easier than suppressing sperm production
2) Women have a period during their reproductive life when they are not fertile, —pregnancy. During pregnancy, high levels of progesterone suppress ovulation preventing a competing pregnancy. The female pill mimics pregnancy by administered progesterone to women, thereby preventing ovulation. Men don't have an analogous period of temporary infertility.

THE VERDICT: It is more scientifically challenging to make a contraceptive pill for men than for women—but not impossible. The biological mechanism for such a contraceptive is well established. The lack of an actual product that you can buy seems to be due to a lack of investment from pharmaceutical companies, who have not thus far been willing to spend the huge amounts of money that would be necessary to create, test, and market a male pill, when a perfectly good female pill already exists. A male birth control may certainly come one day, but that day is years away. When it does come, lots of men will probably give it a try.

http://gawker.com/5991509/where-the-hell-is-the-male-birth-control-pill

Omega

  • Banned
  • FDR Authority
  • *
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #189 on: July 03, 2014, 09:13:16 AM »
0
Stop saying 'you', you don't know my gender or sexual orientation and that is very awkward.
I absolutely do not care about your gender or sexual orientation
According to rules of this forum we are discussion ideas not our real personality, so when i say "You" I refer to you as to representative of whomever you represent at the moment.
exactly as you did here:
Quote
The idea is to be okay with the reality that 'you' aren't going to get laid all the time, and that doesn't make 'you' worthless.

It has nothing to do with being worthless.  It is injustice when nice men see that "bad boys" get rewarded while their efforts are pretty much futile.
In the end women simply lose respect as beings capable to make good judgments.

When such woman gets pregnant or abused nice guy can only say: why you chose that guy instead of me when you were 15? 


Actually you claimed to be male, unless you lied I will assume you're male.

Considering how "he " speaks and what he says he must be transgender.
there is too many references to transgender people in his texts also nobody would bring out sexual orientation along with gender unless there is mismatch.

Omega

  • Banned
  • FDR Authority
  • *
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #190 on: July 03, 2014, 09:22:22 AM »
0
THE VERDICT: It is more scientifically challenging to make a contraceptive pill for men than for women—but not impossible. [/url]


contraception for men does exist and it is pretty efficient and even has less side effects than birth controll pils.  It is pretty old invention formely known as RISUG®, which was ignored for long time
http://www.parsemusfoundation.org/vasalgel-home/
the main problem seems o be unpredictability of results, because it can randomly fail,
but many people are suspecting feminist conspiracy, as usual.

MikeTO

  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
  • Respect: 0
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #191 on: July 03, 2014, 11:34:49 AM »
0
It's still in clinical trails it doesn't mean it will be available to the public.  Personally I rather not have sex at all to avoid getting a woman pregnant.

Nice try though.

Lee Li

  • Libertarian Socialist
  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Respect: +2
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #192 on: July 03, 2014, 11:57:39 AM »
0
Quote
I suggest that young men learn to detach their egos from the act of getting laid. To have self esteem inspite of it. As Lowkey said,

It has nothing to do with self esteem. you can have enormous confidence and self esteem going trough the roof and still you wont get laid.
as I described, problem is that if you treat women nicely they simply sexually ignore you.

Can you finally understand that if man is buying dinner for you and saying nice wolds he is doing that only to take you to his bed? He will take great care to make you think that he does not care about sex, but that is only thing in his head all the time.

When man is not interested in sex and still does same things he is probably looking for incubator to impregnate, maid to clean his home or punching bag.

sexual desire is most innocent thing you can expect from man.

Stop saying 'you', you don't know my gender or sexual orientation and that is very awkward.

The idea is to be okay with the reality that 'you' aren't going to get laid all the time, and that doesn't make 'you' worthless.

Just stop acting like you can read the minds of every man on this earth, even most of them. Maybe what you say is indicative about YOU, but you are not a psychic clone of every member of your gender.

Actually you claimed to be male, unless you lied I will assume you're male.

MikeTO I never claimed to be male or anything at all. I only laugh at you all constantly attempting to gender me, like it means anything or has any relevance.
Keep Calm And Disobey

Lee Li

  • Libertarian Socialist
  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Respect: +2
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #193 on: July 03, 2014, 12:02:12 PM »
0
MikeTO asked: "Why don't men have a say in abortion or not?"

Because it's not your body.

Transmen can sometimes retain the ability to have children, in which case that man has a right to decide going through abortion. Because it is his body.

If you have an abortion, I fully support your choice. But I don't support your desire to control other people's choices over their own body.

Yes but that's not equality that feminism claim they want because with equality both sex need to have a say in it.

Everyone owns their own body, and that is equal. No democracy here, everyone needs their Personal Space to have full control over. You are not entitled to invade people's personal space!
Keep Calm And Disobey

Lee Li

  • Libertarian Socialist
  • FDR Enlightened
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Respect: +2
Re: But Feminists ARE Socialists with panties!
« Reply #194 on: July 03, 2014, 12:06:34 PM »
0
Stop saying 'you', you don't know my gender or sexual orientation and that is very awkward.
I absolutely do not care about your gender or sexual orientation
According to rules of this forum we are discussion ideas not our real personality, so when i say "You" I refer to you as to representative of whomever you represent at the moment.
exactly as you did here:
Quote
The idea is to be okay with the reality that 'you' aren't going to get laid all the time, and that doesn't make 'you' worthless.

It has nothing to do with being worthless.  It is injustice when nice men see that "bad boys" get rewarded while their efforts are pretty much futile.
In the end women simply lose respect as beings capable to make good judgments.

When such woman gets pregnant or abused nice guy can only say: why you chose that guy instead of me when you were 15? 


Actually you claimed to be male, unless you lied I will assume you're male.

Considering how "he " speaks and what he says he must be transgender.
there is too many references to transgender people in his texts also nobody would bring out sexual orientation along with gender unless there is mismatch.

Because of patriarchy, that is why the 'bad guys' win! So end patriarchy and you're good.
Keep Calm And Disobey