“...I need convincing that Molyneux even HAS philosophical views to debunk. He's mostly an endless daily vomiting of personal grievances mixed with justifications for treatment of others as worthless inferiors.” --Money Detonator
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I know y'all don't like to question Feminism in any real critical way (not a jab, but an observation), so you wouldn't notice the sharp rise in men taking to Men's Rights and MGTOW communities online and in real life.
As a Zeta-Male and a voice in the MRM I completely reject Stefan Molyneux from my movement. He is a disgrace to the rest of us, but has gained the confidence of MRAs across the board
I'd like to point out an error: I think it's spelled espousing and not expousing.
And I'm not certain that you're correct about the male-female ratio. I can't tell genders on the boards and I don't have access to Moly's Youtube statistics, but the chatroom is heavily populated by females.... females who agree with Moly's approach to gender.
1. All is not well in the Molyneux marriage.
2. He has settled on a core audience.
3. There is some murky adolescent anger at work.
Quote from: QuestEon on June 04, 2014, 10:44:42 AM 1. All is not well in the Molyneux marriage. I think this is speculation.
But all I wanted to say is this. Isn't it possible, even likely, that none of these theories are correct? They're all pure speculation yet they're still brought up as the top choices, and they also sound as if they were almost hand picked to feed into an extant fascination / obsession with FDR held by people who already have a beef with him. IOW speaking to the choir.